fbpx
01 / 05
Time to Think Small

Blog Post | Science & Technology

Time to Think Small

Todd Myers's new book highlights the growing opportunities to care for the environment by shifting power from politicians to individuals.

Summary: This article invites the reader to rethink the conventional approach to environmental problems, which hinges on state interference and scare tactics. It reviews a book by Todd Myers that demonstrates how new technologies inspire individuals and civil society to come up with innovative solutions to ecological conundrums. It discusses examples of how these technologies have tackled pollution, rescued wildlife, and generated incentives for environmental stewardship.


A version of this article was published in El Comercio (Peru) on 6/6/2023.

World Ocean Day is June 8. World Environment Day is June 5; it’s different than Earth Day, which is April 22. And there are world days for biodiversity, recycling, reducing the use of plastic bags, and much more throughout the year.

With so many days intended to foster awareness and action, the reader can be forgiven for not being aware of them. It is often thought that complex ecological problems require national solutions and international treaties and bureaucracies. Why take individual initiative if what you can do to help is very limited?

What has managed to capture the public’s imagination is the apocalyptic vision of a certain sector of the environmental movement that literally declares that the end of the world is coming if a fundamental reorganization of modern society is not imposed. But such extremism only hinders public debate because of it’s dismissiveness of differing points of view.

It’s time to think small. That’s the title of a new book by Todd Myers (Time to Think Small: How Nimble Environmental Technologies Can Solve the Planet’s Biggest Problems), which highlights the growing opportunities to care for the environment by using new technologies that shift power from politicians to individuals and civil society. The world has changed since the modern environmental movement emerged in the 1970s, when solutions overwhelmingly relied on state intervention. The first director of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Bill Ruckelshaus, recognized this more than 10 years ago. According to Ruckelshaus, “Yesterday’s solutions worked well on yesterday’s problems, but the solutions we devised back in the 1970s aren’t likely to make much of a dent in the environmental problems we face today.”

Today, new technologies make it possible for individuals to collaborate on solutions to ecological problems. Myers offers numerous examples. In Central America, illegal trafficking of endangered turtle eggs has been diminished using trackers that are placed in eggs produced by 3D printers and put alongside the real eggs cared for by the turtles. Thus, the trackers help identify traffickers and their networks.

Millions of metric tons of plastic are dumped into the sea each year, but the nongovernmental organization Plastic Bank is reducing that pollution in several poor countries by paying people through a cellphone system to collect plastic from the environment before it reaches the sea. Plastic Bank has thus prevented a billion plastic bottles from reaching the oceans.

Myers documents how, instead of using their own cars, on-demand vehicle pooling through apps significantly reduces carbon dioxide emissions. Apps such as iNaturalist and eBird allow users to identify plants and animals in nature and create large databases for academic research.

In the United States, the Nature Conservancy used eBird’s bird migration data to offer payments to individuals who create habitats for seabirds. The incentive is the exact opposite of what federal law created to protect endangered species. Under the law, if such a species is found on your property, the government limits the land’s use, and thus reduces its value. Even as it encourages stewardship for the environment, the Nature Conservancy has turned a liability into an asset.

Myers’s book demonstrates how innovation and technology are democratizing environmental stewardship in an increasingly effective way.

BBC | Conservation & Biodiversity

Conservation Slowing Biodiversity Loss, Scientists Say

“In the first study of its kind, published in the journal Science, scientists from dozens of research institutes reviewed 665 trials of conservation measures, some from as far back as 1890, in different countries and oceans and across species types, and found they had had a positive effect in two out of every three cases.

Co-author Dr Penny Langhammer, executive vice-president of environment charity Re:wild, told BBC News: ‘If you read the headlines about extinction these days, it would be easy to get the impression that we are failing biodiversity – but that’s not really looking at the whole picture.

‘This study provides the strongest evidence to date that not only does conservation improve the state of biodiversity and slow its decline, but when it works, it really works.'”

From BBC.

Live Science | Science & Technology

“Digital Twin” of Earth Could Make Super Fast Weather Predictions

“Scientists have created a ‘digital twin’ of our planet that can be used to predict weather far faster than traditional services.

The technology could help prevent some of the catastrophic impacts of disasters such as typhoons and flooding. The intensive data-crunching system could also give us a more detailed view of the future effects of climate change and reveal clues about how to mitigate it.”

From Live Science.

Our World in Data | Pollution

Oil Spills from Tankers Have Fallen by More than 90% since the 1970s

“In the 1970s, oil spills from tankers — container ships transporting oil — were common. Between 70 and 100 spills occurred per year. That’s one or two spills every week.

This number has fallen by more than 90% since then. In the last decade, no year has had more than eight oil spills, as shown in the chart.

The quantity of oil spilled from tankers has also fallen dramatically. Over the last decade, the average is less than 10,000 tonnes per year, compared to over 300,000 tonnes in the 1970s.”

From Our World in Data.

The Hill | Pollution

US Emissions Fell 17 Percent from 2005 Levels

“Net U.S. emissions increased by 1.3 percent in 2022 for a total of 5,489 million metric tons of carbon dioxide compared to the previous year, according to the EPA. The agency attributed the bulk of the increase to higher levels of fossil fuel combustion as the economic rebound and lifting of pandemic-related restrictions that began in 2021 continued.

Despite the year-over-year increase, however, the EPA determined that net emissions fell 16.7 percent compared to 2005 levels between 1990 and 2022. This decrease was partly due to a decline in emissions from industry over the last decade, according to the EPA. The agency attributed this drop to several factors, including macroeconomic trends like the shift from a manufacturing-based economy to a service-based economy. Improvements in energy efficiency also played a role, as did transitions to lower-carbon fuels.”

From The Hill.