fbpx
01 / 05
Time to Think Small

Blog Post | Science & Technology

Time to Think Small

Todd Myers's new book highlights the growing opportunities to care for the environment by shifting power from politicians to individuals.

Summary: This article invites the reader to rethink the conventional approach to environmental problems, which hinges on state interference and scare tactics. It reviews a book by Todd Myers that demonstrates how new technologies inspire individuals and civil society to come up with innovative solutions to ecological conundrums. It discusses examples of how these technologies have tackled pollution, rescued wildlife, and generated incentives for environmental stewardship.


A version of this article was published in El Comercio (Peru) on 6/6/2023.

World Ocean Day is June 8. World Environment Day is June 5; it’s different than Earth Day, which is April 22. And there are world days for biodiversity, recycling, reducing the use of plastic bags, and much more throughout the year.

With so many days intended to foster awareness and action, the reader can be forgiven for not being aware of them. It is often thought that complex ecological problems require national solutions and international treaties and bureaucracies. Why take individual initiative if what you can do to help is very limited?

What has managed to capture the public’s imagination is the apocalyptic vision of a certain sector of the environmental movement that literally declares that the end of the world is coming if a fundamental reorganization of modern society is not imposed. But such extremism only hinders public debate because of it’s dismissiveness of differing points of view.

It’s time to think small. That’s the title of a new book by Todd Myers (Time to Think Small: How Nimble Environmental Technologies Can Solve the Planet’s Biggest Problems), which highlights the growing opportunities to care for the environment by using new technologies that shift power from politicians to individuals and civil society. The world has changed since the modern environmental movement emerged in the 1970s, when solutions overwhelmingly relied on state intervention. The first director of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Bill Ruckelshaus, recognized this more than 10 years ago. According to Ruckelshaus, “Yesterday’s solutions worked well on yesterday’s problems, but the solutions we devised back in the 1970s aren’t likely to make much of a dent in the environmental problems we face today.”

Today, new technologies make it possible for individuals to collaborate on solutions to ecological problems. Myers offers numerous examples. In Central America, illegal trafficking of endangered turtle eggs has been diminished using trackers that are placed in eggs produced by 3D printers and put alongside the real eggs cared for by the turtles. Thus, the trackers help identify traffickers and their networks.

Millions of metric tons of plastic are dumped into the sea each year, but the nongovernmental organization Plastic Bank is reducing that pollution in several poor countries by paying people through a cellphone system to collect plastic from the environment before it reaches the sea. Plastic Bank has thus prevented a billion plastic bottles from reaching the oceans.

Myers documents how, instead of using their own cars, on-demand vehicle pooling through apps significantly reduces carbon dioxide emissions. Apps such as iNaturalist and eBird allow users to identify plants and animals in nature and create large databases for academic research.

In the United States, the Nature Conservancy used eBird’s bird migration data to offer payments to individuals who create habitats for seabirds. The incentive is the exact opposite of what federal law created to protect endangered species. Under the law, if such a species is found on your property, the government limits the land’s use, and thus reduces its value. Even as it encourages stewardship for the environment, the Nature Conservancy has turned a liability into an asset.

Myers’s book demonstrates how innovation and technology are democratizing environmental stewardship in an increasingly effective way.

Blog Post | Human Development

The Real Threats to Golden Ages Come From Within

History’s high points have been built on openness, Johan Norberg's new book explains.

Summary: Throughout history, golden ages have emerged when societies embraced openness, curiosity, and innovation. In his book Peak Human, Johan Norberg explores how civilizations from Song China to the Dutch Republic rose through trade, intellectual freedom, and cultural exchange—only to decline when fear and control replaced dynamism. He warns that our current prosperity hinges not on external threats but on whether we choose to uphold or abandon the openness that made it possible.


“Every act of major technological innovation … is an act of rebellion not just against conventional wisdom but against existing practices and vested interests,” says economic historian Joel Mokyr. He could have said the same about artistic, business, scientific, intellectual, and other forms of innovation.

Swedish scholar Johan Norberg’s timely new book—Peak Human: What We Can Learn from the Rise and Fall of Golden Ages—surveys historical episodes in which such acts of rebellion produced outstanding civilizations. He highlights what he calls “golden ages” or historical peaks of humanity ranging from ancient Athens and China under the Song dynasty (960-1279 AD) to the Dutch Republic of the 16th and 17th centuries and the current Anglosphere.

What qualifies as a golden age? According to Norberg, societies that are open, especially to trade, people, and intellectual exchange produce these remarkable periods. They are characterized by optimism, economic growth, and achievements in numerous fields that distinguish them from other contemporary societies.

The civilizations that created golden ages imitated and innovated. Ancient Rome appropriated and adapted Greek architecture and philosophy, but it was also relatively inclusive of immigrants and outsiders: being Roman was a political identity, not an ethnic one. The Abbasid Caliphate that began more than a thousand years ago was the most prosperous place in the world. It located its capital, Baghdad, at the “center of the universe” and from there promoted intellectual tolerance, knowledge, and free trade to produce a flourishing of science, knowledge, and the arts that subsequent civilizations built upon.

China under the Song dynasty was especially impressive. “No classic civilization came as close to unleashing an industrial revolution and creating the modern world as Song China,” writes Norberg.

But that episode, like others in the past, did not last: “All these golden ages experienced a death-to-Socrates moment,’” Norberg observes, “when they soured on their previous commitment to open intellectual exchange and abandoned curiosity for control.”

The status quo is always threatening: the “Elites who have benefited enough from the innovation that elevated them want to kick away the ladder behind them,” while “groups threatened by change try to fossilize culture into an orthodoxy.” Renaissance Italy, for example, came to an end when Protestants and Catholics of the Counter-Reformation clashed and allied themselves with their respective states, thus facilitating repression.

Today we are living in a golden age that has its origins in 17th-century England, which in turn drew from the golden age of the Dutch Republic. It was in 18th-century England that the Industrial Revolution began, producing an explosion of wealth and an escape from mass poverty in much of Western Europe and its offshoots like the United States.

And it was the United States that, since the last century, has served as the backbone of an international system based on openness and the principles that produced the Anglosphere’s success. As such, most of the world is participating in the current golden age, one of unprecedented global improvements in income and well-being.

Donald Trump says he wants to usher in a golden age and appeals to a supposedly better past in the United States. To achieve his goal, he says the United States does not need other countries and that the protectionism he is imposing on the world is necessary.

Trump has not learned the lessons of Norberg’s book. One of the most important is that the factors that determine the continuation of a golden age are not external, such as a pandemic or a supposed clash of civilizations. Rather, says Norberg, the critical factor is how each civilization deals with its own internal clashes, and the decision to remain or not at a historical peak.

A Spanish-language version of this article was published by El Comercio in Peru on 5/6/2025.

New York Times | Health & Medical Care

FDA Approves Studies of Pig Organ Transplants

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has given the green light to two biotechnology companies for clinical trials that will transplant organs from genetically modified pigs into people with kidney failure. If successful, these studies could lead to the broader use of cross-species transplantation, a dream of medical scientists for centuries…

The United Therapeutics study, which is expected to begin midyear, will start with six patients who have been on dialysis for at least six months but do not have other serious medical problems. There will be a three-month waiting period between each transplant so that doctors can learn from the outcomes.

If the first six transplants are successful, the trial will expand to include up to 50 participants in what is called a phaseless trial — a type of study that combines the traditional Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials and can lead directly to approval…

The eGenesis trial will begin with three patients with kidney failure who are unlikely to receive a human organ within five years.”

From New York Times.

NBC News | Human Freedom

Americans Can Now Visit China for up to 10 Days Without a Visa

“China said Tuesday it was expanding its visa-free transit policy, allowing Americans and other eligible foreign travelers to stay in parts of the country as long as 240 hours, or 10 days, as officials try to attract more overseas visitors.

China’s National Immigration Agency announced the measure, which is effective immediately, on its WeChat account, saying passport holders from 54 countries are eligible. They include countries in Europe, Latin America and Asia, as well as the United States and Canada.

Previously, travelers could stay in China visa-free for as long as 72 to 144 hours depending on where they visited, as long as they continued on to a third country or region.”

From NBC News.