fbpx
01 / 05
Fox Tossing: When Animal Cruelty Was High Society Fun

Blog Post | Treatment of Animals

Fox Tossing: When Animal Cruelty Was High Society Fun

Humans aren't the only beneficiaries of moral progress.

Summary: A recent case of animal cruelty in New Mexico shocked the public. History shows that such brutality was once routine entertainment. For centuries, bloodsports like “fox tossing” drew crowds and even royal participation, where animals were flung, beaten, and killed for amusement. Today, those practices are unthinkable, banned, and widely condemned. This shift reflects a form of broad moral progress: as societies grow more empathetic, cruelty gives way to compassion.


When a New Mexico sheriff’s deputy was recently filmed grinning as he killed a rabbit by throwing it against a police vehicle, public outrage was swift. He was placed on leave and charged with extreme cruelty to animals, which is a felony. The incident was stomach-turning, yet perhaps even more shocking is how ordinary such violence used to be.

For much of human history, killing small animals for fun wasn’t just tolerated, but celebrated. Among the more disturbing examples was the European bloodsport known as “fox tossing,” a competitive event popular among aristocrats in the 17th and 18th centuries. Despite the name, the victims were not limited to foxes; hares, beavers, badgers, wildcats, boars and even wolves were also flung to their deaths in this brutal form of entertainment. 

An engraving of German aristocrats engaged in the sport of fox tossing or Fuchsprellen (lit. “fox bouncing”).

The rules were simple and horrifying. European courtiers would gather in an enclosed or cordoned-off area and form pairs, with each person holding one end of a length of cloth. Both men and women partook in this strange pastime, and it was a popular sport among romantic couples. Terrified animals were released into the enclosure. When one darted across a cloth, the participants would pull it upward to launch the animals into the air. The goal was to hurl the critters as high as possible. Some managed to reach heights of approximately 7.5 meters, or 24.6 feet.

Whatever animals survived the ordeal were bludgeoned to death at the event’s end. At one fox tossing contest in Vienna in 1672, Leopold I, emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, is said to have personally joined in the lethal clubbing of the injured animals.

For a later emperor, Charles VI of Austria (1685-1740), custom held that “the hunting season started with fox tossing,” a tradition not to be skipped.

Augustus the Strong, an 18th century ruler of Saxony and King of Poland, had a particular love of the bloodsport. When King Frederick William of Prussia visited Saxony in 1728, Augustus greeted him with a gruesome display that saw 200 foxes thrown to their deaths. But that was hardly his record. At one contest that Augustus held at Dresden, an astonishing “687 foxes, 533 hares, 34 badgers and 21 wildcats were tossed to their deaths. At the end, 34 young boars and three wolves were turned into the enclosure” to mark the game’s grand finale.

The game wasn’t without risks to the players, either. Wild animals don’t take kindly to being turned into projectiles. Fox-tossers were frequently clawed or bitten. “That injuries on such occasions were not infrequent need hardly be mentioned, and more than one tosser was marked for life by the claws of a wildcat or the tusks of a young boar,” noted one writer. 

Some animals proved more dangerous to victimize than others. One witness noted that wildcats were particularly difficult to toss during these sadistic games, opining that they “do not give a pleasing kind of sport, for if they cannot bury their claws and teeth in the faces or legs of the tossers, they cling to the tossing-slings for dear life, and it is next to impossible to give one of these animals a skillful toss.”

It’s easy to look back at this history and recoil in disbelief. But we shouldn’t mistake this for a bizarre cultural footnote. Throughout much of history, tormenting animals for fun was considered unproblematic. In fact, fox tossing was just one among many similarly cruel activities.

“Sports such as eel-pulling, pig-sticking, cat-headbutting and fox-tossing all fall under this purview: these ‘games’ are senselessly brutal, but to players of the era they were merely light pre-supper entertainment,” notes writer Edward Brooke-Hitching, who compiled an entire book of such historical pastimes entitled “Fox Tossing, Octopus Wrestling and Other Forgotten Sports.” Cruelty was often the centerpiece of communal fun.

So what changed? Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker believes humanity became more compassionate as the spread of literacy, education and reason led people to consider the perspectives of others, expanding humanity’s “circle of empathy” and eventually extending compassion even to animals, while dramatically reducing violence in many different areas of life. Fox tossing was ultimately recognized as uncivilized in the early 19th century and abandoned, eventually outlawed across Europe and in many other locales. Like other now largely forgotten bloodsports such as gander-pulling and ritualistic cat torture, humanity tossed “fox tossing” aside in favor of more innocent amusements. 

Throwing small animals to their deaths, an activity that once entertained our forebears, is now a criminal offense, as that New Mexico sheriff’s deputy discovered. The cruelty once seen as charming is now met with condemnation.

And that is progress that shouldn’t be tossed away.

This article was published in The Well News on 8/22/2025.

Axios | Crime

Violent Crime Drops in SF as Major US Cities See Declines

“Violent crime dropped sharply across America’s biggest cities — including San Francisco — in 2025, according to data reviewed by Axios…

Zoom in: Homicides in San Francisco fell 20% from 2024 to 2025, per preliminary data analyzed by the Major Cities Chiefs Association, which examined statistics for 67 of the nation’s biggest police departments.

Rape dropped nearly 38%, while robberies decreased by about 25% and aggravated assault by almost 13%.”

From Axios.

Our World in Data | Slavery

Almost All Countries Have Ended Large-Scale Forced Labor

“Just nine countries did not have large-scale forced labor at any time since the late 18th century.

After a small number of countries reduced forced labor substantially in the early 1800s, the rest of the 19th century, and the first decades of the 20th, saw steady successes in the fight for abolition.

Progress accelerated in the mid-20th century. In just a few decades, dozens of countries abolished large-scale forced labor: at the end of World War II, almost 100 countries still had such systems in place. Only one generation later, by 1975, that number had fallen to 31. In recent decades, the number of countries where forced labor is common has continued to fall, though at a slower pace.

In 2024, there were nine countries with large-scale forced labor.”

From Our World in Data.

DW | Capital Punishment

Death Penalty on the Decline in Southeast Asia

“From Vietnam to Malaysia and Indonesia, Southeast Asian governments are narrowing the use of the death penalty and edging, often cautiously, toward abolition. 

At present, eight of the 11 Southeast Asian countries retain the death penalty. Only Cambodia, the Philippines and Timor-Leste have abolished it in law.

But recent years have seen most of the retentionist states abide by de facto moratoriums on executions and pass new legislation so death is no longer the mandatory punishment for certain crimes.”

From DW.

g1 | Crime

Murder Rates Drop in Brazil for the Firth Year in a Row

“Brazil reported a drop in murders for the fifth year in a row: there were 34,086 cases in 2025, down from 38,374 in 2024. According to the figures computed until Tuesday (20) by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security, there was a reduction of 11%.

The vast majority of states had fewer violent deaths last year, following the national standard. In the Amazon, this drop was 33%. On the other hand, in five states and in the DF, there was an increase.”

From g1.